Oh diddums, you losing your cool again mugsley. careful young...

  1. 15,445 Posts.
    Oh diddums,  you losing your cool again mugsley.  careful young fella they might de-list you if you keep up with the abuse.

    Here is noaa's monthly surface data

    03042016.JPG

    And Giss.  Well they infill with the limited data that they have already butchered on top of the already homeginised NOAA GHCN / BOM products.
    GISS actual coverage which uses selected land stations and extends that out to 1200 kilometers into the ocean???  If no ocean data is available.  Figure out that one.  The logic is absolutely stupid.

    Giss data below from here

    So here is the 250 klm grid section that 1 station can cover.  As you can see only about 80% of the world is covered.  Infilling does a great job of getting you over the new records threshold BS we continually here..
    Ocean coverage first then land coverage
    030416ocean.JPG 030416land.JPG

    And yet GISS seem to think when they do the 1200 Klm grid section which is nothing but massive infilling that there records are a true representation of the world climate.  Surely you can see a minor problem here Red.
    030416 combined.JPG




    A reminder of what GHCN and GISS do to your data.



    A reminder on how GISS think that NOAA and BOM are totally useless at homeginising data.  So they do there bit as well.


    And here is BOMs take on Darwin Airport.  Big Difference isnt it.


    Last edited by jopo: 03/04/16
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.