Solar - Terrestrial connection, 33914409, page-39 - HotCopper | ASX Share Prices, Stock Market & Share Trading Forum

Originally posted by jopo ↑

A strengthening of the interplanetary magnetic field leads to more intensive variations of the high-latitude ionospheric electric field that influences the atmospheric circulation.

I have made it clear that in my opinion after reading the 100s of papers by others that they state what the SUN's other facets Solar wind, protons, electrons imf etc have all shown correlation to different global circulation patterns.

How much clearer can it be. I am not here to prove that geo magnetic activity or solar wind explains warming or cooling.

I am here to say that You have not considered the suns ability to shift ocean movements and atmosphere. The SUN is more than just SUNLIGHT that you and others have pushed for so long that if i dared to suggest anything different you and others went full ad hom in claiming i was engaging in fanciful stuff. my my how it is changed.

If you are honest you have to acknowledge that the GLOBE as a whole is not warming. There are many regions that are NOT warming. It is generally the N.H that has shown the late twentieth century warming. Sure we differ on the early 21st century. But the SH is not playing ball. And that has been acknowledged by many.

Sure the pathetic comment directed at you specifically was not warranted. Thought I removed that before posting. Sorry.

Expand

"I am here to say that You have not considered the suns ability to shift ocean movements and atmosphere."

I am here to say that you are not a mind reader and you are not entitled to tell me what I have and have not considered. I am also here to say that I have. And that nothing I have read on this, or that you have posted, suggests that in any way cosmic rays are responsible for 100+ years of global warming.

"If you are honest you have to acknowledge that the GLOBE as a whole is not warming. "

Well, I'm honest, and I can tell you there is no way that I have to, or will, acknowledge that the globe as a whole is not warming. The globe as a whole is warming. And if you want to have a stupid primary school grade argument on the semantics of that, then I'd suggest that is foolish.

And while the "pathetic" comment you made was, indeed, not warranted, neither were a number of your other comments. Including your suggestion above that people are dishonest who claim, along with the science, that the globe is in fact warming. That is unacceptable. But not untypical of the ad hominem comments you make.