If you choose to ignore science awards given to budding scientists for their work on coronal holes and hurricanes. That is your choice.
If you choose to ignore NASA papers on Coronal holes and Hurricanes again that is your choice
If you choose to ignore NASA acceptance of Solar winds and ozone that is your choice.
If you choose to ignore all papers that show the correlation of solar winds and other Atmospheric observations that is your prerogative. NASA do not ignore it so why should you?
I am unable to offer alternative explanations to those who flatly refuse to accept the above factual examples just given. There is many many more.
The irony is that you without question accept Arrhenius observations and other observations pre 1980 when the data suits gives you a outcome you want!.
I have a name for peeps like that!
Do you except the notion that SOLAR WINDS alter our atmospheric chemistry??
