If you are going to deny speech and/or respect to people you disagree with you could at least define your terms.
You use the vague and disingenuous term 'climate denier'.
Do you mean:
- Someone who denies there is climate?
- Someone who denies climate changes?
- Someone who denies the historic record empirically show causes changes that are above pre-industrial variation?
- Someone who denies that we know what causes changes to the climate?
- Someone who denies that CO2 is the main driver - ie AGW is overstated?
- Someone who denies that the likely additional CO2 will not cause catastrophic changes to the climate - CAGW is overstated?
- Someone who denies that sweeping economic and social changes like the GND are needed to combat climate change?
- Someone who denies it is prudent for Australia to act alone on these sweeping changes while the much larger carbon emitters are growing their emissions?
- Someone who denies a particular tax or action is prudent or disagrees with cost/benefit?
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Some climate deniers should be pitied, but none deserve respect.
Some climate deniers should be pitied, but none deserve respect., page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 980 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SBW
SHEKEL BRAINWEIGH LTD
Dani Nadri, Country Manager Australia
Dani Nadri
Country Manager Australia
SPONSORED BY The Market Online