If you are going to deny speech and/or respect to people you disagree with you could at least define your terms.
You use the vague and disingenuous term 'climate denier'.
Do you mean:
- Someone who denies there is climate?
- Someone who denies climate changes?
- Someone who denies the historic record empirically show causes changes that are above pre-industrial variation?
- Someone who denies that we know what causes changes to the climate?
- Someone who denies that CO2 is the main driver - ie AGW is overstated?
- Someone who denies that the likely additional CO2 will not cause catastrophic changes to the climate - CAGW is overstated?
- Someone who denies that sweeping economic and social changes like the GND are needed to combat climate change?
- Someone who denies it is prudent for Australia to act alone on these sweeping changes while the much larger carbon emitters are growing their emissions?
- Someone who denies a particular tax or action is prudent or disagrees with cost/benefit?
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Some climate deniers should be pitied, but none deserve respect.
If you are going to deny speech and/or respect to people you...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 980 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)