Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

"...if you don’t like the word “settled” to describe climate...

First 488 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
madamswer

16,402 Posts.

7961

09/12/19

14:46

Post #: 41871202
Share

Originally posted by bellcurve ↑

ah Copperbod, the semantic pedant poster, whose many posts on HC climate threads fit comfortably into the denial sub-theme of simply nit picking.

Probably because those who deny the science coming from AGW and climate change don’t have a scientific leg to stand on, so in the case of Copperbod resort to semantics.

if you don’t like the word “settled” to describe climate science think of a synonym that covers it, such as established.

so the science of AGW and climate change is well established and supported by the overwhelming majority of climate scientists.

there is no established science supporting those who deny AGW and climate change.

none.

that’s why your pedantry comes to the fore, and semantics.

Expand

"...if you don’t like the word “settled” to describe climate science think of a synonym that covers it, such as established."

What about "hypothesised"?
Will that do?

.
6 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 496 more messages in this thread...

First 488 Last