i think, put in perspective, the BTE-5 result was promising
BTE-4 would have been 7km away from BTE-2
BTE-5 would have been taken back towards BTE-2 in a southerly direction but one would assume east of BTE-3
I assume BTE-3 would have been further west than BTE-2, as in the diagram below
i think we must keep in mind the explorers are professionals and that they just missed the estimated synclinal structure with BTE-4 and hit "something" (not yet related) with BTE-5 shows they have some idea of that they are doing
each 1km square at 30m thick is 50m tonnes so it is promising, speculatively
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CEO
- some perspective
some perspective, page-13
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 95 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)