Hi SL,Yes I understand basic maths. But if I brought at .4 and...

Hi SL,

Yes I understand basic maths. But if I brought at .4 and it went to .3, wouldnt that be -25%, not -33% ? (Sorry couldnt help myself, but I know what you mean)

As I elluded to earlier today. As far as Im concerned, my shares have no value to me in this stock. (my personal risk/reward allocation...explained a little more at bottom)

They will however have value as soon as I show green. And I believe this will eventuate, and in the not-to-distant future.

I believe (yes, I know you don't), that Wal Muir will changes things around.

It has gone down over last 2 days. If it didnt fluctuate at all....that would give me more concern than anything that you have repeatedly stated, over, and over , and over.

Tonight, I spent a couple of hours researching Mr Muir. I was pleased to see some very positive signs in his capability. (I didnt previously know anything of him).

He has provided, what appears to be very professional reports to a number of Companies, Independent Reports, and included presenting to the New Zealand Government. (Ministry of Economic Development).

As well as his credentials he seem to be outstanding, and surely GDN was lucky to get him.

I believe his assocaition with AWT International will be of huge future value, and I see (me specualting), AWT will be used to market for sale, or farm out GE 70 II and /or bring on another partner for Pov.

Dont forget, if this does go up (as I think it will), and people have listened/been scared to/by your comments and don't buy....you therefore have cost them money by virtue of depriving them of profit they would have otherwise recieved.

In this scenario, whats makes you better than your perception (with some merit) thoughts and opinions on RS? -Wouldnt you both equate to being the same, using your own arguement? I am not trying to flame/bait you, just asking that you look at it from a slightly different angle.

When you type with less emotion, I will answer.

If you find something new, that we dont know, good or bad, I'd love you to post it....I will good or bad.

I also lost with GDN of olde. And changed my buy/sell/hold/trade strategies after it. I now work on a bottom line only....that is all stocks show if Im positive or negative.

I have a large number of companies, and mostly just hold. It takes some juggling, disipline and management, but I have traded back my loses of GDN, (and other stocks) since comitting to this new rationale.

At the end of the day if I sold everything....I would be looking at ...do I have more money now, than when I started?...Not this stock got me $+$50.00, this stock
$-25.00, this stock $+80,000, or that stock $-50,000.

I always have a little positive money tied into a higher risk/reward speccie, at this time, it is GDN.

As for the repeated message you seem ordained to deliver, please change the record, its getting stale. Let people do what you keep saying ...DYOR and let the HC GDN thread blossom with intelligent, informative posts, wether they be pro or con GDN.