i think IGAS have all the acreage they can manage at this stage. Unless the end game for Austin is to have a wide area and multiple sites to thin the number of the unwashed at each site.
I feel IGAS won't be around very long after the deal has settled. We could see Shell or BG take it as the NSW asset would also be of value to them. They have yet to show their true stance on UK shale.
something seems a little odd here..., page-9
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)