If you are trying to justify your KDR positioning then shouldn't TAW be at the same point? TAW is 50/50 with AMAL too. KDR should be in the feasibility stage, along with BGS.
BGS already has a 33mt JORC resource. You don't know what you are talking about. The new zones are not included in our NPV calculations. I am basing the 691m valuation from your 880USD spod price and a 25mt resource. Even in our original zone we are open at strike in virtually all directions. Our original resource area could double in size quite easily.
If you don't need to argue with me then why do you continue to try to justify your ignorance? Just block me, i'm too smart for you.
Something to laugh about...., page-45
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 72 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)