Not sure if you meant Graphene here, but I'm going to say there are a hundred different ways to producing graphene (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene_production_techniques and all the variations/iterations of each technique) each will have its place in the upcoming revolution.
I don't think the the production of graphene is the problem anymore, it's been 14 years of R&D since it was first discovered and the plethora of ways to produce it is apparent now. You have to investigate the unique characteristics of each graphene method produced and its appropriateness for industry. For me, one from the many reasons I was attracted to FGR 3-4 years ago is was its crystalline thermal dynamic range differentiation/uniqueness. There are additional intrinsic properties that are yet to be realised, but suffice to say some things can't be replicated or synthesized... yet. See previous announcements and discussions on Raman spectroscopy, which is a technique used to analyze layer number, defects, doping and strain of graphene samples.
Coatings, e-textiles, filtration and cement have all been discussed for years by multiple graphene companies.
The questions are where do you see and in what will hazer's graphene be used?
The purpose of NGI and GEIC as you can probably deduce is to commercialise the range of graphene sources available to match feasible industry application.
BTW, for those that still think the Graphene Revolution is still 3-5 years away. Don't blink...
