Just following the evidence from SPR announcements ie doing my own research. If the SF deposit has the same (ie not similar but the same) mineralisation characteristics as NN, and SL keeps parroting it does, then the 35m interval should turn out to be high grade like NN underground area but how high grade we do not know. The descriptions of the 35m interval sure do have the same descriptions as NN ones published with at least 7,5g/t.
That is why I believe he published the mineralisation descriptions of SF even though there was no visible gold ie mineralisation is the same as NN. Some of the NN holes with the highest grades had no visible gold.
Nothing is certain in life so the results may not be up to the same high grade levels of NN. We should fib$ out thi#coming week.
I expect we will find out how many other holes they have drilled at SF in the last two months and if the 35m interval hits the jackpot we may find out if other SF holes they drilled have similar mineralisation. One high grade hole does not make a NN deposit - need at least 5, maybe more high holes (ie 7g/t and over) to prove its similar to NN.
The 2 holes drilled are not that deep.
BTW drilling will probably need to stop by around the end of April to produce an updated MRE by mid-late June. Unless they change their plans and extent the drilling a month or so.
SPR Price at posting:
66.5¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)