Share
217 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 39
clock Created with Sketch. 14/09/21
17:38
Share
Originally posted by zog:
↑
My thought response to Moosey was quite respectable, certainly in comparison to many he has given in return to me. Moosey is a prolific poser and very enhusistic on SLX but "spruicks" (or up ramp) issues where he does not claim qualifications and often also defy logic and physics; I have taken on the task of "calling out" and providing evidence on issues Moosey makes outlandish claims without evidence (i.e. "a third of that time "); someone may actually think he knows what he's talking about. I consider (and I know some company "insiders" carry similar views) that such "spruiking" does not help the credibility of the company and therefore I call it out - Moosey can argue his case but usually just turns up the volume and does become abusive to me - he usually does not offer a well argued rebuttal.with convincing evidence - it usually ends with an "I believe" or "I reckon"; if he chooses to believe in fairies that's up to him- but I can challenge it."a third of that time " and frankly IMO this is irresponsible (i.e someone may may an investment thinking Moosey knows what he is talking about) and Moosey needs to up his game and refrain from such stupid claims without hard evidence. Whilst i feel Moosey makes a positive contribution to his site (his enthusiasm is second o none) such outlandish claims need strong evidence. Moosey has a long track record of such claims and also other claims which makes no logical sense; I'm just asking him to think through such claims (where he does not claim qualifications) before he goes public; remarkable claims require remarkable evidence; I'm just asking him to up his game (that's not being abusive).
Expand
Sorry Zog,
