You realise Mt Thirsty (BAR/CNJ) has higher Cobalt grades when...

You realise Mt Thirsty (BAR/CNJ) has higher Cobalt grades when compared with CLQ? CLQ'S nickel grades are better however. I've done a post comparing the two deposits feel free to critique:

http://hotcopper.com.au/threads/cobalt-breaks-23-800.2805082/page-108?post_id=19538768#.WALKhXTnbqA

What sets BAR/CNJ apart is the low acid leaching process identified to extract Cobalt. With this in mind we are looking at a 1:1.80 Cobalt:Nickel recovery with a $70m IN capital costs whilst CLQ has 1:7 Cobalt:Nickel recovery with $900M aud capital costs. Mark Creasy's Platx (directly to the north) has also identified a resource to compliment Mt Thirsty.

CLQ has also had 3 different feasibility studies completed in 2000, 2005 and 2016. Each time a different entity - 3rd time the charm we hope!