I'm actually quite comfortable with bell potter initial...

I'm actually quite comfortable with bell potter initial coverage. I think reflects a relatively credible analysis with risks and potential mitigating factors. Plenty scope to upgrade if risks gradually ticked off. Very conservative but sensible.

the TON report from GMP scares me. If you didn't see GMPs name on it you would have thought it was written by Brad Boyle himself. In certain parts they even more bullish than him. Total absence in listing out risks and mitigating factors......all upside upside go go go. They even said the deal is "almost too good to be true"......and that's verbatim......OMG.

Frank......stay away from this bucket shop please. We want credibility. Not stupidity.