Great Q!
My first thought is that I imagine that the impractical side of this Q is that lights would function but not project forwards or emit light unless you were at a distance to view it many many years later, from a polar-opposite position.
(Ignoring the vacuum that would occur and the fact that a filament would not ignite unless it was hermetically sealed)
Rationale:
Light speed is a constant velocity and therefore cannot accelerate beyond the speed it already is at - ie the speed of the car.
Therefore they would operate (ignoring vacuum), but not function as designed as they focus angle/aspects could not in fact exist in the absence of projectability.
The Q does introduce inconsistencies though as does my answer and i will be pondering it for some time.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- speed of light question
speed of light question, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 46 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
JBY
JAMES BAY MINERALS LIMITED
Andrew Dornan, Executive Director
Andrew Dornan
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online