Capital would come from the same place where we currently get our capital from: equity markets.
If two separate entities had a higher combined market cap than a single combined entity then over the two there would be less total dilution to achieve the same outcome, not more.
Of course with the U enrichment tech at a different readiness level than the ZSS, one outcome would be that dilution would move in one direction over the other (i.e., if the ZSS entity was given a massive market cap and U was the stub, then the dilution on the U side would be greater, and vice versa).
If incumbent shareholders are enriched by a spinoff then accessing additional capital through a potential CR down the road becomes much easier.
The only good argument against this suggestion that I can think of are the investment banking fees that it would entail, which is a real cost. But given how hot QC is right now, I think that it is definitely something that should be at least shopped around.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SLX
- Spinning off Zero Spin
SLX
silex systems limited
Add to My Watchlist
4.98%
!
$4.58

Spinning off Zero Spin, page-3
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
$4.58 |
Change
-0.240(4.98%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.090B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$4.79 | $4.82 | $4.51 | $2.946M | 636.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 1500 | $4.57 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$4.59 | 1827 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 1500 | 4.570 |
1 | 2500 | 4.550 |
1 | 251 | 4.530 |
2 | 2221 | 4.510 |
6 | 7366 | 4.500 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.590 | 1827 | 1 |
4.600 | 400 | 1 |
4.610 | 8124 | 1 |
4.650 | 200 | 1 |
4.700 | 1472 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.12pm 29/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SLX (ASX) Chart |