Cheers Captain. Forget Investor Services and email...

Cheers Captain. Forget Investor Services and email [email protected] and [email protected].


Now yes we may end up with Senior lender with 51% of CER, but with 90 senior lenders I think it is, it's not a majority 51%.

And yes even if it was they are after what we are after and that's ROI. That's income, capital growth, security of investment. So why is that bad for us?

Worst case we get .44 or near PS in our pockets if CER is broken up.

Captain if the situation is true and not just FUD why aren't they saying it as it is? Most of CNP management's comments are ambiguous.

They need to solidify actual details and get off the warm and fuzzy PR trail.

Get them to address and answer Defabs post.

Until this occurs I'm still NO because I'm not losing value on maybe scenario.

And as I emailed them, if they push ahead without a proper "in the best interests" of CER shareholders then they're open for another class action.

CNP can DIAF for what I care.