Share
467 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 213
clock Created with Sketch.
15/12/23
17:00
Share
Originally posted by TheAlpha1:
↑
Yes... yes, how predictable. A slew of positive announcements over the past month, exceeding expectations and the needle moves half a cent. Drip feeding exceptional news provides very short term, in most cases only daily bumps in SP. While consistent and positive news is reassuring for any floated company in most cases, this model isn't viable for the REE sector IMO. Better to fight fire (bots and other manipulators trying to suppress SP) by ignoring the short term SP and think in terms of quarters when dealing with market announcements. If we only had met test results announcements over the last few months, leaving the assays from the fall drilling campaign a closely guarded secret and loping them into the updated JORC and perhaps even not including that until the PEA is finalised then SP would burn the bots, while giving LT holders and those jumping on board as LT holders who understand the vision the opportunity to increase their holdings as we all seem to keep doing, providing a strong safeguarding base from any take over offer, which wouldn't be feasible at this point unless G. Hill and the handful of other major shareholders on this forum like Waiken and Blue were to vote in favour and IMO none of you would consider this unless it were a multiple of more than a couple billion. Not many of us would blink if SP were to fall to under 10c and scramble to get a larger slice of the pie. Hoping to see Don in a Proactive interview published sometime today so market has time to absorb it over the weekend. This is an effective strategy keeping us as the last posted video heading into the next week as proactive doesn't post on weekends. Likely comes at a higher cost but we have seen this come with higher viewership numbers in the past where I've noted we paid for or were fortunate to be the last post of the week on their channel. Probably the former and paying a little more for that exposure. Who else would prefer management ignores the SP support with regular announcements and moves to a large form market moving announcement structure in the future? As said, the SP would rapidly increase if we only had say the met tests over the last few months and the assays from the fall drill campaign and JORC and maybe even the PEA in a single announcement. Not only would this be beneficial to the SP and crushing the bots but also attracting the overall market with un-ignorable tantalising announcements. Would also save the $300k or so annual marketing budget to be better utilised, think The Australian and AFR not proactive and investor coffee. My best guess is management is trying to keep the SP from being manipulated too much with regular announcements and marketing because of the upcoming NASDAQ listing, yet in saying that it's also what they've always done. IMO they've more than proved to the majority of shareholders that their funds are in good hands. Our new management/BOD structure has a proven record and is well suited to the task of making us a producer. We voted to make them prove their fantastic track records before they can reap the rewards of shareholders, as well, to quote someone or multiple people from HC they were given the company on a silver platter and still need to prove their worth. They will, but maybe shareholders should be prepared to sacrifice timely announcements for un-ignorable market rattling jaw dropping announcements with quarterly announcements. I for one would rather have the updated JORC and PEA rolled into one announcement. We already can figure out what the JORC will look like with a high degree of confidence. Repeating mistakes of the past isn't an effective strategy, Hallecks initial JORC was pumped up and while shockingly good didn't move the needle much and not for long. Gibbs said post JORC, why keep digging for diggings sake? Well, in hindsight he was wrong there. To summarise I think post NASDAQ and pre updated JORC and PEA in Q1 should be released on the same day. Anyone else think this is a better strategy? I hope management/BOD reads and takes note of what's said on HC and I believe they do it reflects in announcements and interviews a lot of the time. They're getting invaluable advice for free! I hope they heed what I'm saying in this post!
Expand
I apologise for the long form repetitive ramble, no glasses and full disclosure I'm under the influence of P-Forte and tramadol today (bad back), clearly showcased in the repetitive ramble. Yet, the content is there, and I stand behind what I say fully.