Spotlight on American Rare Earths, page-42

Due diligence is of course would be at the minimum you are going to take on about the team your going to invest in.

Then of course it would be advisable to "review" an opposite view, then add that to your risk rating if it held any weight..

thus I am still eager to read a reply.

Couple other points in your post..
You can see the date of my join up to HC, so it might give you an idea of why I gravitate back if i am taking an active interest in a stock.. but of course reading across a few other platforms to comfirm my bias.

compare this space to Twitter within the crytpo pumpers its rather tame, which is to be expected as HC has had it fair share of litigation from written posts on topics..thus it is advisable to read the fine print..

Re: Peralta Grant.
Had to look it up, Seems the Golden Gate Bridge might be up for sale as well if we are heading down that pathway.

I would hope your not alluding to a 'Rugpull' on data being presented by the team here.. As that could land you in a little hotwater.

but interested in maybe why you would take it down that track as happy to explore it a bit more if you have any links that might support this thinking..