Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

nih123, thanks for replying. Worth noting that S + F are patent...

First 20 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Katavi

741 Posts.

3

01/10/14

17:12

Post #: 14059291
Share

Originally posted by nih123 ↑

i dont look at balance sheet, its too choppy to look at esp with service based businesses, pointless to look at

i look at Revenue, top line, and bottom line, and segmented revenue. these show that australian business is in structural decline.

stock is an avoid , esp as we are spoiled for opportunities, both at IPO level and on the market.

you cant compare it with SGH and SHJ, their markets are not in structural decline, and services are catered to the mass market. What is the ip law stuff, too niche, trying to take advantage of the market bubble in law firms.

Expand

nih123,
thanks for replying.
Worth noting that S + F are patent attorneys, not lawyers. Some patent attorneys are also lawyers, or employ lawyers, but you do not need to be a lawyer to become a patent attorney. Patent attorneys typically have a scientific background. The requirements one needs to satisfy to become a patent attorney are difficult and time-consuming.
I do think this is a point of difference to lawyers and to break into their market is not easy.
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

GMD

Genesis set for higher gold production in FY25 and earlier mill start

ASX

ASX explains: How 'futures' are predicted

RDN

Raiden Resources jumps 11% as Andover South drilling to kick off with PoW on Minister's desk

TAT

Tartana Minerals firms up producer status with recent 150tn shipment of copper sulphate to the NT

Is the ASX getting its groove back? Here's 5 IPOs in September to watch

There are more pages in this discussion • 143 more messages in this thread...

First 20 Last