So true.
And Turnbull, after trying so hard to palm the SSM off,
wasted $122 mill. or more, carried on like he invented the whole deal.
Don't know what's more revolting, the way they carried on in Parliament,
or being forced to see images of two men/two women holding hands and kissing.
If there has been a 'road rage attack', or a car crash, on news on telly,
we get a WARNING that some images may be distressing, why don't
we get the same warning when they post these abhorrent and vile acts on T.V. ?????
My parents taught me what morals were, but 65 years later, we just throw that aside.
See in America a BAKER is in an EMORMOUS legal battle after refusing to bake
a special wedding cake for a gay couple. DID not refuse to serve them,
but refused to bake a (gay) cake, on religious grounds.
They felt they had to make a stand, and show this bigot up.
Will not be a verdict until June next year. One of the many judges in this hearing
had something to do with the original SSM laws, missed what exactly.
So it seems a few loud mouths can change what was frowned upon, for the last 200 odd years.
Next we'll have the murders, rapists and thieves petitioning the govnuts to legalise those as well.
If I went to help somebody that was broken down on the side of the road,
and it happened to be two men, holding hands.............................................
###
Just because SSM is legalised, doesn't mean we all have to agree with it, like it,
nor accept/condone it.
Expand
