Besides the valid claims by the 'NO' campaign against the SSM trying to normalising homosexual sexual habits thru the school sex education.
What the campaigner's are failing to do, is to belittle the SSM lobbyist argument that it is about "the love between two people".
Love between SSM couple doesn't need to involve the words "marriage, wedding or words normally associated with heterosexual couples.
IMO it is the importance of these words that is important to them, and not inequalities, which is really used as a distraction tactics.
They aren't contented in any alternative wordings in the title or the body of any amended legislation which describe them differently to heterosexual ceremonial wedding wordings.
Thru sex education deceiving the young that their sex practises is normal, and gaining the words marriage etc, they deluded themselves into believing that the community will considered them as "normal".
