AT 02/05/02 17:04, I posted to Roamer "a predictable reaction at the short term trendline, but I'm expecting it to continue down. Like you, happy to wait out for a lower base in the 30s before looking at it again. Besides, its still got further to go before you'd call it great value"
You then chimed in with some religious tripe, then
AT 02/05/02 19:28, I replied to you with "... I'm totally disinterested in your religious convictions, although the obvious duality of beliefs (christianity and Taoism) does appear to match your "changable" personality. Nor do I care for your salesmanship, self-promoting or analytical "skills"...
Then I added "As for STP, Alpha and I both successsfully called a 0.59 top during the early March rally in STP --- the intersection of a resistance trendline and 162% retracement of the corrective move from 27/11 to 4/2" and went on to reiterated my short term (disclosed) view "Today's reaction was expected, however I wouldnt be holding STP until its completed a decent decline and tested low to mid-30's."
At 03/05/02 11:12 I replied to another post by Roamer: "...the stock should settle further over of the short to medium term before continuing to advance. In any event, there is plenty of time to swing some capital back in once a base has been confirmed..." "...there is plenty of time to swing some capital back in once a base has been confirmed."
And that’s it for discussion of STP for that thread.
I do not hold STP, my short term view is SELL, so your claim that "Carisian thinks a while, then replies with a YES! " is completely fallacious ... and one must presume another deliberate fabrication from the you GP
Well GP …… looks like youre all muddled again.
STP Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)