Break even costs aren't simular. STO has higher sustaining CAPEX, higher OPEX, buys 3rd party gas as an extra cost.
EBITDA for WPL is 2 times STO in 2017, but it's not a perfect metric. Above I've mentioned the main causes of these differences.
STO boosted earnings by a 1B impairment (reducing tax), improving its net debt by $800m in 2017, should have been 500m without impairment, 90% of CAPEX was sustaining production, so around 560m underlying cashflow + growth investment.
WPL was at around $2b using the same metric, about half invested into Wheatstone plus GE (growth) the other half returned to holders via dividends.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- STO VS WPL
Break even costs aren't simular. STO has higher sustaining...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WDS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$29.23 |
Change
-0.220(0.75%) |
Mkt cap ! $55.27B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$29.04 | $29.86 | $28.55 | $205.8M | 7.028M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 583 | $29.22 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$29.24 | 691 | 9 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 133 | 29.200 |
2 | 1179 | 29.190 |
3 | 1304 | 29.180 |
2 | 1186 | 29.170 |
6 | 1649 | 29.160 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
29.220 | 1318 | 10 |
29.230 | 1989 | 8 |
29.240 | 2178 | 12 |
29.250 | 1556 | 5 |
29.260 | 1496 | 5 |
Last trade - 14.08pm 19/04/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
Last
$29.32 |
  |
Change
-0.220 ( 0.61 %) |
|||
Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
$29.02 | $29.85 | $28.55 | 619878 | ||
Last updated 14.28pm 19/04/2024 ? |
Featured News
WDS (ASX) Chart |