RRS 0.00% 0.1¢ range resources limited

Was this an article published by the SMH?Unbelievably polemic...

  1. 110 Posts.
    Was this an article published by the SMH?
    Unbelievably polemic against an Australian company. What was the reasoning for such an article?
    Which side are they on?
    Would the highly esteemed SMH journos, responsible for this ärticle" indicate: Which side are they on?
    Surely, journalistically NOT on the side of Humane, Western, Civilised Values...
    The Taliban like, the extreme islamist regime, hated by all, not only in Somalia but also in the rest of the islamic world and Africa, was ousted, the Country (Somalia) has after 15 years a chance to have a democratic, humane unifying force in power, and SMH takes a view that can only be characterised as a malicious attempt by some scribe to win a kudos or two by those who employed him?
    Shame on you SMH. Shame on Fairfax. The Whole World is moving forward in a humane, Western, Democratic, way, and the Journos from the highly esteemed Sydney daily are craving (indirectly) for the return of the Talibanistic regime in Somalia? Which side are you on guys? Surely not on the FREEDOM side. Surely not on the side of Democracy......
    One wonders.....IS SMH still the Australiam Democratic Icon once was?
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add RRS (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.