OkI used 2.15% and 4 for density And got bard to calculate (AI)...

Ok

I used 2.15% and 4 for density And got bard to calculate (AI)

"Sure, let me help you with the NPV calculation.
Here are the assumptions I will make:
The ore body is a rectangular prism.
The ore grade is uniform throughout the ore body.
The ore density is constant at 4.
The copper price is constant at 8000 USD/tonne.
The mining and processing costs are 10 USD/tonne.
The transportation costs are 5 USD/tonne.
Define the variablescopper_price = 8000 USD
ore_density = 4
grade = 0.0215
length = 1300
width = 300
depth = 24
Calculate the volume of the ore bodyvolume = length * width * depth # Calculate the mass of the ore bodymass = volume * ore_density #
Calculate the copper content of the ore bodycopper_content = mass * grade Calculate the value of the copper contentcopper_value = copper_content * copper_price
Calculate the mining and processing costsmining_processing_costs = mass * 10
Calculate the transportation coststransportation_costs = mass * 5
Calculate the NPVnpv = copper_value - mining_processing_costs - transportation_costs # Print the NPV
Output:6438179999.999999

Therefore, the NPV of the copper mine is 6.438 billion USD.

It is important to note that this is just a rough estimate. The actual NPV will depend on a number of factors, such as the accuracy of the geological model, the mining and processing costs, and the future copper price."


Thats 9.46B AUD

Say 5% to AW1 value at this point = 470m"

Yes I used 2.15% Cu
Yes I assumed 4 density
No I didn't include 2750 or 2200

So .... let's discuss ..... like civilised forum participants ...... show us your calculations .... as yes .... it is staggering to think that a 30m odd MC company could be sitting on a shallow copper resource of even a fraction of this

Gottinhimmel