storm v raiders, page-41

They lost by 2, the penalty when they scored their first 2 points was blatant cheating. Nobodies hands were within 2 feet of the ball. If it wasn't cheating the referee is blind. If he is blind why is refereeing a semi final? That was the difference in the end. Raiders were extremely unlucky and I don'y follow either sides. Did the best side win? I am having second thoughts. Who gets the most penalties is irrelevant. Its where you get them that is important. I bet Melbourne got more in The Raider's 20 . 12 against 13 and they win by 2, not really a strong result.