Responding to Stevie K and ignoring stirrers like Andewst10who contribute nothing.
1) If Fox is pro-Trump, and as very often mentioned here, thelargest and most successful of the media stations, are you suggesting they areanti-Trump as they surely account for at least 10% of the market? Or are theythe vocal minority?- Fox is a cable channel and is the most successfulof cable channels but none of the cable channels have anywhere near theviewership of the free-to-air networks. Free to air has the greatest spread andgreatest influence
- Fox is not as Pro-Trump as once was the case. SinceRINO Paul Ryan got on the board and Rupert stepped back giving control to hissons Fox has started to turn to the darkside as commentators like Wallace andCavuto have shown.
2) There is no 100% of anything on either side- Name one social media platform, one Google subsidiary, one Fundingplatform etc that is not pro-Democrat and is not manipulating in favour ofDemocrats
3) It wasn't a hoax, bipartisan agreement that Russiainterfered and continue to interfer. The only part that comes close to a"hoax" is no confirmation that anyone on Trump's campaign colludedwith them. Russia is far from being an innocent party to anything in America'spolitics.- Finding it a bit frustrating that I have to statethe obvious, but it is the lie that the Trump campaign colluded with Russiansto steal the 2016 election that was core to all the ridiculous claims bymainstream media and Democrats (as if there is any distinction between thetwo).
4) It wasn't attempted, he was impeached.- More half-truths. As you well know I was referring to attemptedremoval from office which was not successful but if you need to be a pedantthen yes the Democrat controlled house eventually handed over articles ofimpeachment to the Senate which voted to not prosecute those articles.
5) COVID isn't a hoax? Or are you taking issue with aspecific part of COVID, if so, hoax isn't the correct word to use.- The decision by the CDC to recommend a reaction to the virus waspolitically driven, not based on science. The swine flu which was far moredangerous to working age people was treated very differently because it wasunder the Obama administration. This COVID response was a failed attempt toinfluence an election.
6) Election fraud information: https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud 1296confirmed cases since 1983. Pretty solid argument against widespread fraud.- Funny how when it suits the left to claim they were robbed of anelection then voter fraud is a thing and yet when conservatives point out the manycases of voter fraud the left take part in the left say “it’s not widespread”. I would argue that any voter fraud is unacceptable and should be punishable by very long prison sentences.
7) Provide actual evidence for that? Sounds alarmist. If theyare 'illegal' immigrants, then they shouldn't be on a voter role thus unable tovote. But if it's a genuine concern, maybe the Republicans should pass theelection security funding bills that McConnell keeps blocking. I believethere's about 12-13 election security bills sitting on Mitch's desk that he'srefusing to bring to a vote. Bills that already passed the house.- I wonder what else has been bundled with the bills. That is anotherfavourite trick of your side of politics. Pack the bills with peripheraldemands that are totally unacceptable and then only report on the bill beingrejected but never why it was rejected.
8) Actual evidence of that? Sounds alarmist.
- This is thestated intention of states like Nevada. Do your research before accusingsomeone of being alarmist.
Maybe, just maybe, people have differing priorities in life,and maybe those priorities align with a different political party- Yes, that is true.Whilst both sides of politics have a very similar list of what is important tothem it is prioritisation of those lists where the conflict usually lies.
