Perhaps BT but why use a different name and only post here a few...

Perhaps BT but why use a different name and only post here a few days later. Anyway its irrelevant and I wish you would comment on my main point regarding the annual administration overheads of 28% of nav. I absolutely hope to engage with the board but I feel this will be more effective as a group. And as a holder, the last thing I aim for is to dissuade new investors, that why I want the administration fees addressed as previously promised by the board and I want to understand what our investment plans going forward are.