Stand by my post that the original post was a mischievous attempt to stir the pot with an irrelevant history of unethical conduct by SWC directors.
I expected your response and that it would expand on the actual mechanism of Views formation (I was not privy to this). Whether beginning from a shelf company or via the receivers is beside the point as there is now a new business, new constitution and articles, new directors, management and new major shareholders.
No retraction - No apology - My point stands
It was a poor attempt to tarnish current management by implication. Shame Shame Shame
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- stuffed
Stand by my post that the original post was a mischievous...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)