I am no auditor, but have some insights (a little knowledge is a dangerous thing) but I would have thought auditors are very conscious of materiality & its normal they have systems to make their own audit risk assessment in some shape or form. For something very material they would follow & test the complete business process. I continue my previous points; & as previous posters have pointed out you do not have to be a clever auditor to identify so much revenue coming at end of year raises revenue recognition issues & other related matters. They should have been all over the Chinese contract accounting for just about 100% of NPAT - after all what else was their to do for their $280k fee? If the auditors did not understand Chinese contract, its revenue recognition policy etc their audit report was obviously a waste of our $280K, ;-) Still whistling in the dark! ;-)
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- stupid, gullible, or both ;-)
I am no auditor, but have some insights (a little knowledge is a...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 21 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NBS (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
9.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! n/a |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |