STX 2.13% 24.0¢ strike energy limited

Gimo, I am just getting more and more confused. Why on earth...

  1. 1,206 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 271

    Gimo, I am just getting more and more confused. Why on earth would an index fund commission a third party to do the short selling so the third party could borrow shares and sell these shares to the index fund. If there are short sellers about who are depressing the market then it would seem that the index funds, having to buy, would be better off just buying on market.

    To me it would seem that a much better plan for a company like STX, - which has zero prospect of dividends for years but has very high prospects of considerable share price increases - would be to buy the shares on market and lend them out to the shorter's. By doing this
    the index fund would, in addition to the share price increase, also pick up the lending fee. I presume that an index fund, having to hold long term, would have absolutely no concern about short term share price depression that their lending to shorter's might cause.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
Last
24.0¢
Change
0.005(2.13%)
Mkt cap ! $686.9M
Open High Low Value Volume
23.5¢ 24.3¢ 23.0¢ $2.375M 10.01M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
7 397363 23.5¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
24.0¢ 496987 6
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 10/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ?
Last
24.0¢
  Change
0.005 ( 2.13 %)
Open High Low Volume
23.0¢ 24.0¢ 23.0¢ 4094689
Last updated 15.59pm 10/05/2024 ?
STX (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.