re: fidelity - 10% - question follows I guess I should have rephrased.
By punt I meant they wouldn't have bothered with something so small unless they were punting that they could turn a modest sum into a large sum (that was material to them), ie getting a really exceptional return.
I see their involvement as really positive, as they would have done some thorough research with information and specialist advise not available to most of us.
My two main concerns are addressed by the placement:
1) Funding, as obviously more will be forthcoming. They need lots of funds to get into production in a serious way quickly.
2) Too good to be true. I'd say Fidelity would have checked under every carpet.
You've done well Poyndexter, good research, you deserve a could profit.
Entropylord
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- EPG
- substancial holder
substancial holder, page-17
Featured News
Add EPG (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online