re: fidelity - 10% - question follows I guess I should have rephrased.
By punt I meant they wouldn't have bothered with something so small unless they were punting that they could turn a modest sum into a large sum (that was material to them), ie getting a really exceptional return.
I see their involvement as really positive, as they would have done some thorough research with information and specialist advise not available to most of us.
My two main concerns are addressed by the placement:
1) Funding, as obviously more will be forthcoming. They need lots of funds to get into production in a serious way quickly.
2) Too good to be true. I'd say Fidelity would have checked under every carpet.
You've done well Poyndexter, good research, you deserve a could profit.
Entropylord
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- substancial holder
re: fidelity - 10% - question follows I guess I should have...
Featured News
GML
Gateway Mining sells WA Eastern Montague gold project to Brightstar for $14M – half of that in shares
TG1
TechGen Metals kicks off airborne geophys survey at Sally Downs copper play – a first for the permit
KAI
Pilbara Minerals buys land off Kairos part of its York gold project for $20M – and a 2% royalty on any PLS gold sales