Would any of you Aus-based holders (or non-holders and/or non-Australians with the knowledge, for that matter) mind explaining to a dim Pom what significance these notices have in Australian law?
I assume that these declarations are intended to set the record straight about who has control of BQT? But do they have any other significance?
I note that the total voting rights declared amount to 49%, is this in itself significant? It does appear that - despite suspicion voiced from time to time as to who holds what interests in '4C', 'Rudana' and possibly also 'Prime Asset Finance' - the total voting rights available to the 'block' is less than 50%. This would seem to be good news...
Unless, of course, anybody out there knows differently.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- substantial holder notices
BQT
bqt solutions limited
Would any of you Aus-based holders (or non-holders and/or...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
MND
Monadelphous inks $200M contract with Woodside to help build Pluto LNG – but will it make Scarborough cheaper?
NVA
Nova locks in NASDAQ US market listing at a value of only US$3.3M as ASX gets quieter and quieter