Sudden Adult Death Syndrome baffles doctors, page-77

very strong retort cracker. great rhetoric.

I don't have such skills of rhetoric and so I rely on real evidence and genuine science. you do make a solid argument to defend your source but your defence remains piss-weak as the linked sites are entirely devoid of evidence, and it applies to each "News" item and "Media" item. obviously I checked more than one or two.

the sites linked are plain and straight anti-science, the direct opposite of the initial page presentation.

You know what is there and so you try to pretend that its only "one or two".

cracker your argument exploded when you posted the link. it is fake news, extremist anti-science with no evidence, mere sophistry.

"Cant have people thinking for themselves,". ...... people who think for themselves chase down information so as to be well-informed when they decide their position. all you offer is lies and spin.