Suggestions please, page-5

  1. 15,292 Posts.
    Another nail in the coffin for AGW.   Do you see any continued cooling in the stratosphere mjp?  


    Not so sure that Methane is increasing in the stratosphere mjp.  There is inferred data and observations that it may well be the case it is actually decreasing.  NOAA have indirectly acknowledged this and we have covered this via the Solomon paper on decreasing water vapour in the stratosphere

    Water vapour in the stratosphere comes from two sources.  Rising water vapour making it past the tropopause and from the oxidation of Methane in the stratosphere.  You take your pick as to which one is the cause of the decrease in water vapour or perhaps it is both.   It does not matter as both go against the settled science anyway

    This from NOAA
    A 10 percent drop in water vapor ten miles above Earth's surface has had a big impact on global warming, say researchers in a study published online January 28 in the journal Science. The findings might help explain why global surface temperatures have not risen as fast in the last ten years as they did in the 1980s and 1990s............

    ........The authors show that these changes occurred precisely in a narrow altitude region of the stratosphere where they would have the biggest effects on climate.

    RSS satellite as of today.  The perfect package to view the stratosphere temps in this region as specified by NOAA

    250218.2.JPG

    Your wunderground piece stated;

    "Climate models predict that if greenhouse gases are to blame for heating at the surface, compensating cooling must occur in the upper atmosphere"

    Another nail in the coffin for AGW.   Do you see any continued cooling in the stratosphere mjp?  

    No you don't do you!  Just as NOAA has stated back in 2010.  Nothing has changed other than the continuing adjustments to observed data.


    So what do we have now?  The settled science would have us believe that temperatures are still increasing at an alarming rate.
    But the very fundamentals of  settled climate science does not match reality.

    So where has the settled science gone wrong.

    2 options
    The GHE and modelling is JUST plain wrong or,
    Temperature data is being adjusted to keep the game alive.  But in doping so they are now discarding one of the fundamentals behind the GHE.

    the settled science is NOT so settled is it.

    "Climate models predict that if greenhouse gases are to blame for heating at the surface, compensating cooling must occur in the upper atmosphere"


    talk about nailing yourself to the floor.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.