Good discussion. I think we will be getting some more info very soon. A few questions on my mind after announcements.. Were there any Geo's onsite for the initial drill holes? Why was the visual identity of the sulphides only included in the second round drilling announcement and not the first? The second announcement suggests there was some identification of sulphides made during the first round of drilling. Of course, very happy to dismiss these questions around timing if we receive positive results. Any comments?
sulphides intercepted at second target, page-55
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 27 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
