It seems unusual that only one of the two disputes, specifically the one in Congo, is nearing a satisfactory resolution for SDL. I would assume that discussions between the respective parties in both Cameroon and Congo are taking place behind closed doors. The fact that the Congo government is making reparations suggests they likely have a clear understanding of the project’s future and the potential benefits it holds.
On the other hand, the dispute in Cameroon is being handled quite differently. This distinct approach could reflect strategic differences in how the
Cameroonian government is engaging with SDL, possibly due to political, economic, or legal considerations unique to their situation. Understanding the
rationale behind these divergent approaches is crucial for interpreting the progress and potential outcomes of the settlement processes.
I would invite shareholders to share your thoughts on this.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?