That wasn't a very good response considering this is just a...

First 48 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
shares007

2,268 Posts.

20

14/10/21

15:26

Post #: 56802355
Share

Originally posted by DVEous: ↑

http://aust-sino.com/files/files/984_217._Pre-Discovery_Action_Commenced_by_Sundance_-_13Oct2021.pdf

13 October 2021
Pre-Discovery Action Commenced by Sundance

AustSino Resources Group Ltd (AustSinoor the Company) refers to the announcement made by Sundance Resources Limited (Sundance) dated 11 October 2021, within which Sundance notes it has applied to the Supreme Court of Western Australia seeking pre-action discovery against the Company and its Executive Chairman, Mr Ding.

The Company categorically denies any involvement or wrongdoing associated with Sundance losing any rights it says it had to pursue its iron ore project and infrastructure project in Congo and Cameroon.

The Company considers the public statements that have been made by Sundance in relation to AustSino to be an opportunistic attempt by Sundance to distract its shareholder and investor base from the fact that Sundance failed to properly manage the project and key stakeholders.

The fact pre-action discovery is necessary demonstrates that despite its efforts and the public allegations made, Sundance has not been able to establish any wrongs as having been committed by the Company and is fishing for any information that might help it to sell the narrative that it is not responsible for its current positon, in an attempt to have its shareholders and investors blame third parties for what is actually a failure by Sundance itself.

Efforts to try and shift blame to AustSino (and Mr Ding) using announcements to create an implicit narrative that there have been covert and underhanded activities reflects poorly on Sundance.

The Company is currently considering the pre-action discovery proceedings taking into account the Court’s powers under the applicable legislation, the breadth of the request and costs involved. The Company will vigorously defend any substantive actions Sundance brings against the Company for wrongdoing,if they are commenced,including considering potential counterclaims to recover some of the considerable funds it expended in an effort to seek to undertake the proposed placement into Sundance.
____________________________________________

My own interpretation:
SDL's incompetent management does not have a case, to wit, SDL has not delivered any expected outcomes in over a decade of involvement, nor showed signs that this trajectory was about to magically change.

Expand

That wasn't a very good response considering this is just a standard action.It seems a little too heated and perhaps better to just go with the flow.

Last edited by shares007: 14/10/21

SDL Price at posting: 0.6¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
3 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

Palladium's the newest geopolitical hot commodity. But ASX exposure is limited

MKT

The ASX can overlook its Telecomm small-caps. Here’s one diversified brand with an international footprint

MIN

Movers and Shakers: Zip Co, MinRes, Kuniko, more – The week's top ASX gainers

Week 44 Wrap: Relatively boring week ahead of US election; HotCopper's most watched; Oz inflation at 3.5%

The Altcoin Landscape (Part 1): Key alternative cryptocurrencies to watch

Bitcoin hits fresh record as instos pile into BTC ETFs – and Trump helps, too

Aussie inflation seemingly hit a 3 year low. So why's the ASX200 red?

Making money: How many microcaps should be in an investor's portfolio?

What each US election outcome would mean for Australian companies & investors

'We're looking': Nickel-rich Indonesia sounds graphite warning to Aus producers