I think SFI & NEA are completely different plays.
NEA delivers a real service, that people pay a subscription for. It is a real going concern, funding growth from it's own books.
SFI on the other hand, seems to be more focussed on developing it's IP. It has castled itself within a thicket of patents/patents pending. I don't believe it ever ever intends to deliver a real service - unless it gets some outside help to fund such a thing. I believe it intends to sell its technology to others or else garner royalties from the portfolio of IP it is developing. Its a bit like discovering gold, but not having enough money to get it out of the ground. The only way it is ever going to get ahead is on the back of a gorilla.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Sunday Mail Today
I think SFI & NEA are completely different plays. NEA delivers a...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)