The Company and Mr Ding are entitled to be reimbursed by...

First 75 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
tolate

10,656 Posts.

944

19/07/22

10:32

Post #: 62603301
Share

The Company and Mr Ding are entitled to be reimbursed by Sundance for their reasonable
legal costs incurred in defending the Pre-Action Discovery Application, and their reasonable
legal costs of complying with the pre-action discovery orders.

Originally posted by taboon: ↑

This legal case is far from over, early days.

For the announcement above by ANS Summary is :

Sundance were successful in obtaining pre action discovery against Ding and AustSino which they attempted to appeal against. Appeal was subsequently withdrawn and action with respect to this case has proceeded and is ongoing.

" A court may order a person to provide discovery even in circumstances where substantive proceedings have not yet been commenced"

This means that Ding and AustSino are now compelled by the court to not withhold any information and provide relevant documentation as requested in relation to this case.

If you want to read about the facts of the case see attached link below.

https://ecourts.justice.wa.gov.au/eCourtsPortal/Decisions/ViewDecision?returnUrl=%2feCourtsPortal%2fDecisions%2fFilter%2fSC%2fRecentDecisions&id=cb163dad-9cce-4dd6-9af4-3d62ee7e4d03

Expand

3 The Company and chairman Mr Ding consider, and maintain, they have nothing to
hide and have not done anything wrong.
4 As a result of the court proceedings, the number of documents required to be
provided to Sundance by the Company and Mr Ding has now been reduced

ANS Price at posting: 1.7¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
2 Upvote

1 Great analysis

Reply