I suspect this is not quite correct? As far as I was aware it...

I suspect this is not quite correct? As far as I was aware it was a third party planning to majority fund tower one...

"Enviromission notified the Australian Stock Exchange last week that the Southern California Public Power Authority (SCPPA), America’s second largest public power company, has committed to fund the entire cost of developing and constructing the world’s first commercial solar tower, subject to due diligence, and the approval of Enviromission’s lawyers and bankers."

And...

"Mr Davey said the proposed financing from SCPPA was “100 per cent pure equity, no debt”.

SCPPA will be the majority owner of the solar tower, leaving Enviromission as the minority owner."

Not that we have a problem if SCPPA wants to put up the capital!

http://www.sunraysiadaily.com.au/news/local/news/general/us-solar-goahead-power-station-by-same-company-as-buronga-proposal/2421905.aspx?storypage=0