Of course, but trying to suggest super performance would outperform the same investment in the property market is just laughable.
The limit has obviously been placed for a reason, I have t seen the modelling but I would assume it would be the amount at which property wealth growth would historically outperform super performance.
Super is worth nothing if you have to rent a house in retirement
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Super for first home buyers - massive winner for young
Super for first home buyers - massive winner for young, page-110
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 353 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)