Whilst I agree with the last statement. Super is their money, not the governments. If you can only take out a maximum of $50,000, that would easily be supplemented by 25 years of property value growth, plus if done correctly the secondary wealth growth that could come from future leveraging to buy investment properties…
it’s a far better outcome then going 25yesrs and only owning 60% of the house
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Super for first home buyers - massive winner for young
Super for first home buyers - massive winner for young, page-86
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 377 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online