Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

super needs changes says Morrison, page-8

First 8 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
picastoc

28,937 Posts.

424

28/10/15

15:48

Post #: 16274189
Share

Originally posted by picastoc ↑

No couple pensions? So, two married people who share - gas, electricity, water, council rates, food charges (shopping for two is cheaper per person than for one), possibly car expenses, fixed and variable (one car between two), insurances of household possessions, garden maintenance expenses, etc etc etc. The adage "two can live as cheaply as one" although not entirely true, certainly has a lot of truth in it. To pay two people living as a couple the same pension as a single person would be entirely and utterly unfair. As indeed has been preceived by economists involved in calculating the appropriateness of the variations in aged pensions entitlements.

Expand

Whoops. To pay one person half the joint pension of a married/cohabitating couple would be entirely and utterly unfair.

Error in my post above.
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

A junior miner unlocking high-grade potential in British Columbia

Building value through discovery in Mexico’s silver heartland

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

ASX Market Open: Defiant RBA 'hold' decision leaves traders mulling | July 9

First 8 Last