Suspension, page-44

Nothing gained by OBJ in preempting the P&G call if it contains something relevant to OBJ. Why would they risk irritating P&G with professional discourtesy for no gain?

If the call mentions something relevant, I'd expect OBJ will be quoting it, or referencing it in some fashion. It will already be all over the threads here anyway, that's for sure, after we listen to the call!

Of course, it goes without saying that it remains to be seen if there will be anything relevant in it.

While the coincidence of timing is tantalizingly suggestive, and I think it would be huuuge if there is something in there, the announcement delay may still be independent of what the conference call contains and merely be on account of still waiting for P&G's formal nod of approval before making the relevant announcement.

My fingers are crossed hoping the call and the 2nd tech licence are related because that would be a massive bit of endorsement and PR for OBJ tech.

However, even if they are not, the basic news that a 2nd, different bit of OBJ tech has being licensed is still pretty significant. Snowball effect has surely got to kick in with other partners for OBJ tech at some stage.