Sutton Evidence in Doubt, page-9

  1. 50,923 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2
    @daicosisgod; I came across that report myself this morning and thought that Sutton does have some more explaining to do.

    Months ago I indicated on this forum the Victoria's DHHS leadership structure chart showing 130 senior bureaucrats but not including Sutton raised serious questions about how decisions about something like a pandemic are actually made - it's still unclear!

    It remains my view that under that leadership structure the most senior bureaucrat in the DHHS and the Minister responsible for the DHHS are ultimately responsible for all decisions - they determine the structure, the operational processes and policies. Lack of clarity is their failure!

    Thus far it's my analysis that Sutton's performance as CHO has been less than stellar - in public he's a caring, softly-softly operator whose default position is to espouse the least harsh intervention [eg. contract tracing interviews and lying] but together with the faceless people who dictated Victoria's roadmap out of restrictions to Andrews and out of the public gaze, he's apparently pushed for the full Monty.

    Is any of that a sacking offence for Sutton? IMO, not at this stage because in the end Victoria has been delivered from the evil virus so that if he was a corporate CEO he'd get an even bigger performance bonus!

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.