Regardless of TA, I'm just surprised that sceptics were allowed to pose questions to Suzuki. From the descriptions of the show that I have read, he was floundering. As I said, I didn't see it so am just interested in others opinions of his performance.
I am also curious as in the past it seems that the ABC would not allow one of its demigods be to be humbled in the way that he allegedly was.
IMO, David Suzuki is a fraud and hypocrite, and an insufferably pompous one at that. What surprises me is the ABC allowing others to possibly come to the same conclusion when they could have "managed" the show to avoid that. Perhaps in future Dave's handlers won't let him out the door without a collar and leash...Gotta keep the cash rolling in to the David Suzuki Foundation and it won't do to have the founder looking like a gibbering idiot.
So, if you saw the show would you like to confirm or deny Dave performance?
